Legal Opinion
Burch v. Smathers
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided January 3, 2014No. Case No. 3:12-cv-00632-CWDPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER RE: Dkt. Nos. 22, 36, 58, 65
CANDY W. DALE, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court are four motions pending in this action filed by Plaintiff Keith R. Burch against the Mayor of Orofino and members of the Orofino City Council (collectively, “City Council”) under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Idaho law. The City Council filed a Motion for Summary Judgment on all of Burch’s claims, (Dkt. 22), after which Burch moved to amend the complaint (Dkt. 36) and extend discovery (Dkt. 58). On December 4, 2013, the Court heard oral argument on the three motions and all three…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bracken v. City of KetchumIdaho Supreme Court · 2023
- John Ketch LLC v. San Juan CountyDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025