Legal Opinion

Associates Financial Services Corp. v. Welborn

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 1, 1967No. 442PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShabp, J.

In order to recover a deficiency judgment under a conditional sales contract as authorized by G.S. 45-21.38, plaintiff must allege and prove facts showing (1) that defendant executed and delivered to him or his assignor the contract upon which he sues; (2) that defendant is in default under the terms of the contract; (3) lawful repossession and sale of the property or facts establishing the impossibility of such repossession and sale; (4) the application of the proceeds of the sale; and (5) the amount of the deficiency.

In assaying a demurrer, the rule is that the pleader must be given “every…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
  2. Yates v. ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. Harbour-Longmire Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  4. McInerney & Conway Finance Corp. v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Campbell v. Eastern Seed & Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. California Airmotive Corporation v. C. W. Jones, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  2. Appliance Buyers Credit Corp. v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. In Re MarshallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
  4. Ridley v. First National Bank in AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
  5. Ridley v. First National Bank in AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API