Associates Financial Services Corp. v. Welborn
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtShabp, J.
In order to recover a deficiency judgment under a conditional sales contract as authorized by G.S. 45-21.38, plaintiff must allege and prove facts showing (1) that defendant executed and delivered to him or his assignor the contract upon which he sues; (2) that defendant is in default under the terms of the contract; (3) lawful repossession and sale of the property or facts establishing the impossibility of such repossession and sale; (4) the application of the proceeds of the sale; and (5) the amount of the deficiency.
In assaying a demurrer, the rule is that the pleader must be given “every…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Reynolds v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882
- Yates v. ChappellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Harbour-Longmire Co. v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- McInerney & Conway Finance Corp. v. SmithWyoming Supreme Court · 1931
- Campbell v. Eastern Seed & Grain Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- California Airmotive Corporation v. C. W. Jones, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
- Appliance Buyers Credit Corp. v. MasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- In Re MarshallUnited States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
- Ridley v. First National Bank in AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974
- Ridley v. First National Bank in AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1974