State ex rel. Sorensen v. State Bank
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGoss, C. J.
The receiver of the State Bank of Bee duly classified the claim of Vaclav Cink and Anna Cink as invalid. The claim was based upon their certificate of deposit for $2,500, dated July 2, 1930, due in 12 months with interest at 4 per cent. To raise the issue, they filed their petition of intervention setting forth the certificate (but not pleading *492that there was no other or different contract between them and the bank than that evidenced by the certificate itself) and praying classification as a deposit. Vaclav Cink died after the petition of intervention was filed and the cause was duly revived…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State ex rel. Davis v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1923
- Cram v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Spillman v. Security State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1927
- Kuhle v. Farmers State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1927