Legal Opinion

State v. Cash

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided April 2, 2021No. 121467PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 121,467 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. AARON DAVID CASH, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. An appellate court generally reviews the factual findings underlying a district court's suppression decision using a substantial competent evidence standard and the ultimate legal conclusion drawn from those factual findings by applying a de novo standard. An appellate court does not reweigh evidence. 2. For a law enforcement officer's seizure of a citizen to be constitutionally valid, the officer must know of specific and articulable facts that create a…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  5. Rodriguez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Schreiner v. HodgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 2022
  2. State v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  3. State v. FlackSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  4. City of Overland Park v. LaGuardiaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2024
  5. Garner v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2022

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API