Legal Opinion

Schreiner v. Hodge

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided February 18, 2022No. 117034PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 117,034 MARK T. SCHREINER, Appellant, v. CHAD S. HODGE and DANNY SMITH, Appellees. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. When the material facts are not in dispute, an order granting summary judgment presents only a question of law subject to de novo review. 2. The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution prohibits state actors from performing unreasonable searches or seizures. An officer effects a seizure when the officer, through physical force or show of authority, has in some way restrained the liberty of a citizen. 3. A brief seizure is…

2Cases cited68 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  5. United States v. GaubertSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Unruh v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  2. Hodes & Nauser, MDs v. StanekSupreme Court of Kansas · 2024
  3. R.P. v. First Student, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2022
  4. Drouhard v. City of ArgoniaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2024
  5. Drouhard v. City of ArgoniaCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API