Legal Opinion

Price v. Delta Airlines, Inc.

District Court, D. Vermont

Decided May 8, 1998No. 2:97-cv-00012PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SESSIONS, District Judge.

In this action brought under the Air Carrier Access Act of 1986, 49 U.S.C. § 41705, Constance Price, on behalf of herself and her son (now deceased) seeks damages as a result of their being removed from a Comair flight owing to an odor emanating from bandaged tumors on Gregory Price’s legs. Defendants Delta Airlines, Inc. (“Delta”) and Comair, Inc. (“Comair”) have moved for summary judgment on all counts of the complaint, arguing that the suit is untimely; that the decision to remove the Prices was based on flight safety or other permissible reasons,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  5. First Nat. Bank of Ariz. v. Cities Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Avi Ron v. Airtran Airways, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  2. Dobyns v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  3. Breitling U.S.A. Inc. v. Federal Express Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1999
  4. Avi Ron v. Airtran Airways, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013
  5. Avi Ron v. Airtran Airways, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API