Legal Opinion

Fisher v. Consolidated Amador Mine

United States Circuit Court

Decided September 7, 1885Published

Demurrer to Special Answer.

1Opinion of the CourtSawyer, J.

This is a demurrer to a special answer.. The action is brought to recover damages for the unlawful use of certain hydraulic machines, which are alleged to infringe upon reissued letters patent No. 8,876, owned by plaintiffs. 'The answer sets up that the same plaintiffs had previously brought suit in equity against one Hos-kins, to recover the profits resulting from an infringement of the patent by Hoskins in manufacturing and selling machines constructed *202according to the specifications of the patent; that a decree had been rendered in that case in favor of plaintiffs, and against Hoskins,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Birdsell v. ShaliolSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Gilbert & Barker Manuf'g Co. v. BussingU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York · 1875

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API