Legal Opinion

Gilbert & Barker Manuf'g Co. v. Bussing

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Decided January 20, 1875PublishedCited by 5 opinions

[This was a bill in equity by the Gilbert & Barker Manufacturing Company against Abraham Bussing for the alleged infringement of patent No. 93,207, granted to C. N. Gilbert and J. F. Barker, August 3, 1809, for an “improved apparatus for carburet-ting air.”]

1Opinion of the Court

WOODRUFF, Circuit Judge.

The complainants heretofore filed their bill in this court against Oakes Tirrell, in which they charge him with infringing their patent, by the manufacture and sale of gas machines, the exclusive right to the manufacture and sale of which they claim under their patent. *349The decision in that ease [Case No. 5,417] sustained the complainants’ patent [No. 93,208], and held Oakes Tirrell an infringer. Thereupon, an interlocutory decree was entered, requiring the said Oakes Tirrell to account to the complainants for all gains and profits made by him by the manufacture and…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Ypsilanti Dress-Stay Manuf'g Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Michigan · 1890
  2. Allis v. StowellU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Wisconsin · 1883
  3. De Laski & Thropp Circular Woven Tire Co. v. Empire Rubber & Tire Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1916
  4. Stebler v. Riverside Heights Orange Growers' Ass'nDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1914
  5. Fisher v. Consolidated Amador MineUnited States Circuit Court · 1885

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API