Legal Opinion

Martin v. Burr

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 23, 1921No. 2789PublishedCited by 26 opinions

Error to the Court of Civil Appeals for the Fourth District, in an appeal from Kinney County. Burr and others sued Martin and others and recovered judgment. Defendants appealed, and on affirmance (171 S. W., 1044) obtained writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greenwood

The parties to this suit are the owners of lands adjacent to Las Moras Creek, which is a running stream in Kinney and Maverick Counties. Defendants in error are the two lowest riparian owners. Plaintiffs in error are upper riparian owners...

The suit was instituted by defendants in error against plaintiffs in error. Its purpose was to establish the rights of defendants in error to running water in the creek on their lands, for domestic use, including the watering of livestock, and to enjoin plaintiffs in error from interfering with such right by the application of the water to irrigation and…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Thomson v. LockeTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Fletcher v. FullerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  3. Benavides v. HuntTexas Supreme Court · 1891
  4. City of Austin v. HallTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Watkins Land Co. v. ClementsTexas Supreme Court · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Motl v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Deaton v. RushTexas Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Seaway Co. v. Attorney General of the StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964
  4. Pokorny v. YudinCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945
  5. Eidelbach v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API