Legal Opinion

Hurst v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 21, 1934PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinión of the Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

By his last will and testament, John C. Colson, Sr., devised a tract of land in the city of Middlesboro to his daughter, Eudoxia Olivia Colson, who later married and is now the appellant, Eudoxia Colson Hurst, in the following language:

“To have and to hold the said premises above mentioned and described during her natural life, then to her lawful heirs and assigns forever.”

On December 13, 1927, Eudoxia Colson Hurst, then a widow, and her two sons, Wm. D. Hurst, Jr., and John C. Hurst, also appellants herein, mortgaged the property above mentioned…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bank of Louisville v. BaumeisterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  2. White's Trustee v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1888
  3. Davis v. WillsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  4. McAllister v. Ohio Valley Banking & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1903
  5. Cox v. Corrigan-Mckinney Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hammons v. HammonsKentucky Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Louisville Cooperage Co. v. RuddCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
  3. Vittitow v. KeeneCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1936
  4. Renaker v. TannerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Hurst v. Standard Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1948

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API