Legal Opinion

Grant v. Grant

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 7, 1947No. 15685PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jenkins, Chief Justice.

1. It is the general rule that, where an auditor has failed ,to make a ruling upon demurrers or other questions of law properly raised, such a failure should be taken advantage of by motion to recommit, and not by an exception of law filed to such report. Hosher v. Fitzpatrick, 142 Ga. 384 (82 S. E. 1065). However, where such a motion to recommit is actually though irregularly urged in connection with an exception of law, this court would ordinarily pass upon the exceptions taken to the order of the lower court overruling such a motion to recommit. But, where, as here,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kelly v. Strouse & Bros.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Waldrop v. WolffSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  3. Americus Grocery Co. v. Brackett & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Mitchell v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  5. Wilkes v. CarterSupreme Court of Georgia · 1919

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Stores Realty Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Sanders v. Alpha Gamma Alumni Chapter of Delta Sigma Phi FraternityCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. Sunbrand Supply Co. v. Garment Finishing Equipment Corp.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  4. Nash v. CroweSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  5. Swicegood v. HEARDMONT NURSING HOME, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1987

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API