Legal Opinion
Violette v. P.A. Days, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 27, 2003No. C2-01-1254PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SARGUS, District Judge.
On December 18, 2001, Robert L. Violette and Teresa Courts filed this action on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated asserting that defendant P.A. Days, Inc. violated the federal Truth In Lending Act and the Ohio Consumer Sales Practices Act in connection with the sale of automobiles on credit. On January 22, 2002, Mr. Violette and Ms. Courts filed an amended complaint adding William Stover, Mickey Weaver, and Kenneth and Carolyn Adkins as named plaintiffs against an additional defendant, Ricart Properties, Inc. On June 28, 2002, Mr.…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- General Telephone Co. of the Northwest, Inc. v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Swigart v. Fifth Third BankDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
- Gawry v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
- Baker v. Autos, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- Ham v. Swift Transportation Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2011
- Bent v. ABMD Ltd. (In Re ABMD Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.