Legal Opinion
Alexander P. Deseversky v. Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of Patents
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided April 14, 1970No. 22202_1PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Per curiam
The application for patent filed by appellant discloses an electrostatic pre-cipitator for cleaning contaminated or polluted air, the walls of the precipi-tator, which resembles two concentric cylinders with a passage between them, being continuously cleaned by a uniform film of flowing water. An original application filed January 5, 1955, resulted in the issuance of patent 2,937,709 on May 24, 1960. The application involved in this appeal is a division of the original application, and contained five claims. Four claims were allowed. Claim 20 was denied.
The Patent Office held that appellant’s…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Broadcasting Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- United States v. Carlo Bianchi & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- California Research Corporation v. David L. Ladd, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- National Distillers & Chemical Corporation v. Edward J. Brenner, Commissioner of PatentsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2008
- Ralph M. Hackley v. Richard L. Roudebush, Administrator of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1975
- Kappos v. HyattSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Leo J. Fregeau v. Gerald J. MossinghoffCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- Joseph W. Newman v. Donald J. Quigg, Commissioner of Patents and TrademarksCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.