Legal Opinion

Falk v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 12, 1916No. Nos. 19,625—(55)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action in the district court for Lyon county by the administratrix of the estate of George Falk, deceased, to recover $7,500 for the death of her intestate. The ease was tried before Olsen, J., and a jury which returned a verdict for $700. From an order denying its motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or for a new trial, defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the Court

Dibell, C.

Action to recover damages for the death of the plaintiff’s intestate. There was a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant appeals from the order denying its alternative motion for judgment or for a new trial.

1. On February 11, 1914, the decedent took passage from Minneota to Tracy on the defendant’s road. On his arrival he alighted on the north side of the depot and passed to the south side. From the south side a door led to the basement. A few minutes after the arrival of the train he was found on the basement floor at the foot of the stairway dead. The theory of the plaintiff is…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Gordon v. CummingsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
  2. Hayward v. MerrillIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Johnson v. RambergSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  4. Knudson v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1911
  5. Gilbert v. City of TracySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Peterson v. Pete-Erickson Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  2. Fink v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Tierney v. Graves Motor Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  4. City of Suffolk v. HewittSupreme Court of Virginia · 1983
  5. Landy v. Olson & Serley Sash & Door Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API