Legal Opinion

Jones v. Murphy

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided March 2, 2001No. 00-067Published

1Opinion of the Court

772 A.2d 502 (2001)

Julie JONES

v.

Richard J. MURPHY.

No. 00-067.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

March 2, 2001.

Karen Miller of Miller & Tonelli, Randolph, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Peter M. Nowlan of Nowlan & Meyer, Randolph, for Defendant-Appellant.

Present: AMESTOY, C.J., DOOLEY, MORSE, JOHNSON and SKOGLUND, JJ.

AMESTOY, C.J.

Defendant Richard Murphy appeals a parentage order finding him to be the biological father of Eric Jones, the youngest son of plaintiff Julie Jones. Defendant asserts that the Orange Family Court was without jurisdiction to consider plaintiff's parentage complaint against him because:…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Matter of Paternity of JRWWyoming Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Hackley v. HackleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Godin v. GodinSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  4. Richard B. v. Sandra B. B.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Nancy Darlene M. v. James Lee M.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API