Legal Opinion

Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided February 16, 1925No. B-73PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*372MEMORANDUM BY THE COURT

1. The several items claimed, as set forth in Finding VIII, are not recoverable where the bills were rendered to disbursing officers and payments by him were received. See Oregon-Washington R. & N. Co., 255 U. S. 339; 54 C. Cls. 131; Baltimore & Ohio R. R. Co. case, 52 C. Cls. 468.

2. The deductions made by the auditor on account of combinations of fares, namely, $1,780.89 (Finding IX), were proper. The' military arrangements of 1916 and 1917 provided that any party fare used to or from basing points should be authorized as a through party fare. The Southeastern Joint…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Oregon—Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1917
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1919
  5. Norfolk Southern Railroad v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1924

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Ry. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API