Legal Opinion
In re the Estate of Brahaney
New York Surrogate's Court
Decided November 30, 1982PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward M. Horey, S.
The proceeding is one for construction of those provisions in the will of the testator which created (a) a trust for the benefit of one Olive Brahaney, and (b) a trust for the benefit of one Geraldine Brahaney.
OLIVE BRAHANEY TRUST
In the disposition of his residuary estate, the testator directed in clause (d) of paragraph VI that one fifth of his residuary estate be used for the creation of a trust for the *47benefit of a niece, one Olive Brahaney. As to this trust, the trustee was directed to pay to Olive Brahaney the net annual income. Such payment of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re the Accounting of United States Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1957
- In re Will of LarkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- In re the Estate of DammannNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- In re Construction of the Will of GulbenkianNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- In re the Estate of BogartNew York Surrogate's Court · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Estate of CollinsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1982
- In re Marine Midland Bank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- In re the Estate of BrahaneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- In re the Estate of PattersonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1992