Legal Opinion

People v. Swan

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 17, 1995No. 95SA76PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

An inquiry panel of the Supreme Court Grievance Committee approved a conditional admission of misconduct executed by the respondent and the assistant disciplinary counsel, C.R.C.P. 241.18, and recommended that the respondent be suspended from the practice of law for one year and one day and, as a condition of reinstatement, be required to satisfy a malpractice judgment against him. We accept the conditional admission and the recommendation of the inquiry panel.

I

A

The respondent was admitted to the bar of this court in 1983. The conditional admission states that on January 5, 1990, Joseph…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. SwanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People v. SwanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  2. People v. PrestonSupreme Court of Colorado · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API