Legal Opinion

Hobart v. Lubarsky

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 20, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLoring, J.

There was a mistrial in this cause. The case was in substance as follows: Naisawald and Son of New York were molasses brokers and the defendants Kaplan and Lubarsky dealt in molasses under the firm name of the Sugar Products Company. There was evidence that in April, 1909, Kaplan on behalf of the Sugar Products Company employed Naisawald to find a purchaser for some six thousand barrels of Porto Rico molasses, “known by the sample of ‘Blue M grade,’” of which he gave Naisawald a sample.. Pursuant to this Naisawald brought the molasses to the plaintiffs’ attention and they finally offered to…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lowell Bar Ass'n v. LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
  2. Roach v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Politziner v. VanechSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1924
  4. Green v. McCormackSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1929
  5. Abeles & Taussig Lumber & Tie Co. v. Northwest Side Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API