Green v. McCormack
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Opinion of the CourtSnow, J.
The defendant’s motion for a nonsuit is based upon the claimed unenforceability of the alleged contract for want of compliance with the requirements of the statute of frauds. The plaintiffs rely upon the broker’s memorandum of sale as a sufficient compliance with the third of the three alternative requisites by which the non-enforceability of a verbal contract may be overcome, to wit: “some note or memorandum in writing of the contract or sale . . . signed by the party to be charged or his agent in that behalf.” P. L., c. 166, s. 4. The issue involves (1) the validity and proof of brokers’…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bibb v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Butler v. ThomsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hinckley v. AreySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1847
- Bacon v. EcclesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
- Roach v. LaneMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
- Maine Potato Growers, Inc. v. H. Sacks & SonsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1956
- Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944