Legal Opinion
Coyne v. 101 Hudson Street Urban Renewal Associates
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 3, 1998PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Lorraine Miller, J.), entered September 8, 1997, which granted defendants’ motions and cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Plaintiff while working in the employ of Regional Scaffold and Hoisting Company, a scaffolding subcontractor, sustained injury at a New Jersey construction site when he tripped upon a bolt hole in timber laid upon the ground for use as a crane platform; plaintiff had been instructed to walk across the timber by his foreman, also a Regional employee, to avoid surrounding…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Comes v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Russin v. Louis N. Picciano & SonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Padula v. Lilarn Properties Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Havison v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024
- Havison v. Port Auth. of N.Y. & N.J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2024