Legal Opinion

Todd v. Waddell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 2, 1969No. 44503PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Judge.

The first question for decision is the scope of the judgment of dismissal. The remedy of nonsuit as formerly available under Code § 110-310 no longer exists. Code Ann. § 81A-201 (dd). A motion for judgment on the pleadings, where factual material is considered by the trial judge without objection, should be treated as a motion for summary judgment (Code Ann. § 81A-112) but such a motion should be made “within such time as not to delay the trial” and accordingly would be inappropriate here. Code Ann. § 81A-141(b) provides for a motion to dismiss at the close of the plaintiff’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gould v. BarrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Bowman v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
  3. Paulk v. CreechCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
  4. Floyd v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1861
  5. Ferrell v. WightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bennett Iron Works, Inc. v. Underground Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Burney v. ButlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
  3. National Carloading Corp. v. Security Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
  4. Specialized Alarm Services, Inc. v. KauskaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  5. Lumpkin v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API