Todd v. Waddell
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Judge.
The first question for decision is the scope of the judgment of dismissal. The remedy of nonsuit as formerly available under Code § 110-310 no longer exists. Code Ann. § 81A-201 (dd). A motion for judgment on the pleadings, where factual material is considered by the trial judge without objection, should be treated as a motion for summary judgment (Code Ann. § 81A-112) but such a motion should be made “within such time as not to delay the trial” and accordingly would be inappropriate here. Code Ann. § 81A-141(b) provides for a motion to dismiss at the close of the plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Gould v. BarrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Bowman v. ChapmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1934
- Paulk v. CreechCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1911
- Floyd v. WallaceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1861
- Ferrell v. WightSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bennett Iron Works, Inc. v. Underground Atlanta, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Burney v. ButlerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1979
- National Carloading Corp. v. Security Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Specialized Alarm Services, Inc. v. KauskaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Lumpkin v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971