Noyes v. Parsons
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington; Jeremiah Neterer, Judge. Action by F. G. Noyes, as receiver of the Washington-Alaska Bank, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Washington, against W. H. Parsons and others. There was a judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
Read the full summary
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern Division of the Western District of Washington; Jeremiah Neterer, Judge. Action by F. G. Noyes, as receiver of the Washington-Alaska Bank, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Washington, against W. H. Parsons and others. There was a judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error. Tort action to recover compensatory and exemplary damages, under section 7 of the act of Congress of July 2, 1890 (Sherman Anti-Trust Act), for an unlawful combination and conspiracy in restraint of trade in violation of…
1Opinion of the CourtMorrow, Circuit Judge
(alter stating the facts as above). [1] This is an action at law, brought under section 7 of the act known as the “Sherman Anti-Trust Act” (An act to protect trade and commerce against unlawful restraint and monopolies, approved July 2, 1890, 26 Stat. 209). The act provides, among other things:
“Sec. 3. Every contract, combination in form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy in restraint of trade or commerce, in any territory of the United States, ° * * is hereby declared illegal. * * * ”
“Sec. 7. Any person who. shall he injured in his business or property by any other person or corporation by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Savage v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Shulthis v. McDougalSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Newburyport Water Co. v. NewburyportSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Minnesota v. Northern Securities Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Hall v. BurrSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Roseland v. Phister Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942
- Gerli v. Silk Ass'n of AmericaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
- Sunbeam Corp. v. Payless Drug StoresDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1953
- Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.District Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.