Legal Opinion

Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Arkansas

Decided September 23, 1941No. 126PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEMLEY, District Judge.

This is an action for treble damages under Title 15, Section 15 of the United States Code Annotated, which provides as follows: “Any person who shall be injured in his business or property by reason of anything forbidden in the antitrust laws may sue therefor in any district court of the United States in the district in which the defendant resides or is found or has an agent, without respect to the amount in controversy, and shall recover threefold the damages by him sustained, and the cost of suit, including a reasonable attorney’s fee.”

The suit was originally brought…

2Cases cited53 opinions

  1. Story Parchment Co. v. Paterson Parchment Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Swift & Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  3. Eastman Kodak Co. v. Southern Photo Materials Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  4. Keogh v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. American Banana Co. v. United Fruit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Louisiana Farmers' Protective Union, Inc. v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1942
  2. Beegle v. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  3. Columbia Gas & Electric Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1945
  4. Mary Lucille Sandidge v. Ralph J. Rogers 1Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1958
  5. Northern California Monument Dealers Ass'n v. Interment Ass'nDistrict Court, D. California · 1954

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API