Legal Opinion

Hofeldt v. Elkhorn Valley Drainage District

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1927No. 25605PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDay, J.

This action was brought by Fred Hofeldt, hereinafter designated plaintiff, against the Ekhorn Valley Drainage District, hereinafter called defendant, to recover damages claimed to have been sustained by plaintiff by reason of the construction of a dike by defendant along the bank of the Platte river which caused a deflection of the current of the river over and against, the plaintiff’s land, causing the loss of several acres by erosion and damaging his meadow and growing alfalfa by overflowing the same. The trial resulted in a verdict and judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $898.75.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. EmmertNebraska Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Keck v. VenghauseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
  3. Bunting v. Oak Creek Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Miller v. Drainage DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Murphy v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. National By-Products, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1969
  2. Mader v. MettenbrinkNebraska Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Stolting v. EverettNebraska Supreme Court · 1952
  4. Cooper v. Sanitary District No. 1Nebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Courter v. MaloleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API