Department of Transportation v. Crull
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Steigmann
In April 1996, plaintiff, the Illinois Department of Transportation (Department), filed a complaint for condemnation against defendants, Harry and Marian Crull, who owned some property the Department needed for the purpose of widening Route 29 in Chillicothe, Illinois. In January 1997, the jury returned a verdict for damage to the remainder in the amount of $112,000, and the trial court entered an order reflecting that verdict. (The only issue at trial was the amount of damage to the remainder.)
The Department appeals, arguing that the trial court erred by allowing defendants’ opinion witness…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. WilkIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Department of Transportation v. Quincy Coach House, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
- Wilkerson v. Pittsburgh Corning Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1995
- Chicago & Illinois Midland Railway Co. v. Crystal Lake Industrial Park, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1992
- Iser v. Copley Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Sullivan v. Edward HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
- Seef v. Ingalls Memorial HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Copeland v. Stebco Products Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
- Warrender v. MillsopAppellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Clayton v. County of CookAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.