Legal Opinion

Lockart v. Stuckler

Texas Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1878PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Error from Medina. Tried below before the Hon. J. J. Thornton. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion,

1Opinion of the Court

Roberts, Chief Justice.

This suit was begun by injunction against a clerk to supersede an execution issued for costs. The petition alleged that some of the items in the cost bill were incorrect, and prayed for a retaxation of the costs. The plaintiff who recovered the judgment in the former suit was made a party defendant in this suit with the clerk. ' The clerk answered the charges of the bill of injunction at length, and the other defendant answered that he believed the bill of costs to be correct. Before the final trial, the court appointed an auditor to retax the costs, and required him to…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Patton v. CoxTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Dallas Joint Stock Land Bank v. Dallas County Levee Improvement Dist. No. 9Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Wingfield v. HackneyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
  4. Wingfield v. HackneyTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Ward v. ReesWyoming Supreme Court · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API