Legal Opinion

Case v. Wildridge

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1853PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ERROR, to the Franklin Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

This was a petition, under the statute, for partition.

The petition states that the petitioners are tenants in common with John P. Case and Mary, his wife, of certain real estate therein described, and prays the appointment of commissioners to make partition, &c.

Plea, that the petitioners have no title to the land described, &c., and that they and the said Case are not tenants in common, &c.

The cause was submitted to the Court upon a written *52statement of facts. Judgment for the petitioners and partition ordered, &c.

The following are the facts: Ralph Wildridge, the ancestor, was the owner of…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gardner v. CollinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Ex parte BurrU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · 1823

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stout v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Cory v. CarterIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  3. Shellenberger v. RansomNebraska Supreme Court · 1894
  4. United States Saving Fund & Investment Co. v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Barnard v. BilbySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API