Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Harmsen v. Fizzell

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1958No. Docket 48, Calendar 47,013PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharpe, J.

(for affirmance). This is a habeas corpus proceeding brought by Gordon L. Harmsen, the father of David L. Harmsen and Ruth Harmsen, following denial by tbe probate conrt of Berrien county of tbe father’s petition for the restoration of his children by the probate court. The chain of events leading up to the application for writ of habeas corpus is as follows.

Gordon L. Harmsen and Marie Harmsen were married, and as a result of their marriage 3 children were born. On May 29, 1953, Mary Ash, a neighbor of the Harmsens, filed a petition in the Berrien county probate court, juvenile division,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. MacKenzie v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Corrie v. CorrieMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. In re GouldMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Grady v. HughesMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  5. In re StockmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Fritts v. KrughMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  2. In the Matter of LaFlureMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. In Re MathersMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  4. In Re AdriansonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Harmsen v. FizzellMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API