United States v. Jacobs
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This is a direct appeal in a criminal case. We find Jacobs’s claims to be without merit and affirm the District Court’s judgment and sentence.
First, even though the jury acquitted Jacobs of the conspiracy count, the District Court properly increased his sentence based on his significant involvement in the distribution of approximately 11 kilos of crack cocaine. See United States v. Miele, 989 F.2d 659, 663 fn. 3 (3d Cir. 1993). While we agree with the District Court that the proper standard for the District Court to use was “preponderance of the evidence” and not “clear…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Kikumura, YuCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Anthony M. Miele John Jay McElfresh Charles J. Walters Patrick T. Reinstadtler James F. Foster, Anthony M. MieleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Marlon GarthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
- United States v. Gregory FrorupCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Joseph E. DemesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1 opinion
- Meza v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005