Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Dr. N. Jay ROGERS Et Al., Petitioners-Appellees, v. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Respondent-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 31, 1972No. 30651Published

1ConcurrenceGodbold, Circuit Judge

(specially concurring):

I concur with Judge Goldberg in the result that the District Court must allow access by EEOC to items 6 and 7 of the Demand for Access to Evidence. My concurrence is restricted to that result.

I accept a construction of Mrs. Chavez’s charge which EEOC has urged upon this court as an alternative to the construction preferred (and accepted as being within the statute) by Judge Goldberg, and preferred (but considered as outside the statute) by Judge Roney. It is that Mrs. Chavez’s charge could be considered as describing discrimination practiced against her in that she,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Celia SANCHEZ, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. STANDARD BRANDS, INC., Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
  2. Thomas L. Jenkins v. United Gas Corporation and Allan B. CaldwellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  3. Rogers v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API