Legal Opinion
Holm v. Metcalf & Eddy, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 15, 2003PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Schneier, J.), dated August 22, 2002, as granted those branches of the separate motions of the defendants B & Q Construction Corp. and Halcyon Construction Corp. which were to dismiss the causes of action alleging violations of Labor Law § 241 (6) and § 200 and common-law negligence insofar as asserted against them.
Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with one bill of costs.
Under the facts of this…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Mordkofsky v. V.C.V. Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Grgas v. Lehrer McGovern Bovis, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Kopp v. Flagg Properties, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
3Cited by1 opinion
- Manfro v. McGivneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004