Legal Opinion

Manfro v. McGivney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 25, 2004PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*663In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Dillon, J.), dated May 9, 2003, which granted the motion of the defendants Mary Ann McGivney and Holy Trinity School and the separate motion of the defendants Brian Hinman and Lori Hinman pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1) and (7) to dismiss the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

To succeed on a motion to dismiss pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (1), the documentary evidence that forms the basis of the defense must be such that…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Leon v. MartinezNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
  2. Lombardi v. StoutNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Kronos, Inc. v. AVX Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Dillon v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Donohue v. Copiague Union Free School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Specialized Industrial Services Corp. v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. Wald v. BerwitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Simmons v. EdelsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  4. Sheridan v. Town of OrangetownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. Malik v. BealAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API