Legal Opinion

Booth v. Schmoller & Mueller Piano Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1924No. 15282PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.

1. “Under ‘the practice act’ of 1911 (Acts 1911, p. 149, sec. 3), the fact that there'was no formal approval of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial (the only entry thereon being ‘allowed and ordered filed’) will not withdraw such an amendment from the consideration of the reviewing court, or prevent this court from determining the merits of the amendment, unless the point was first raised and insisted on before the trial judge.” Mason v. State, 18 Ga. App. 224 (1) (89 S. E. 185); Eubanks v. Shewmake Brothers Co., 30 Ga. App. 315 (1) (117 S. E. 664).(a) This ruling is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Harper v. Hammond & SonsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1913
  2. Smith v. Southern Spring Bed Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
  3. Creamer & Graham v. ShannonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855
  4. Mason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  5. Eubanks v. Shewmake Bros.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Trans-American Communications, Inc. v. NolleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1975
  2. Mayor of Buford v. MedleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Villa Rica Manufacturing Co. v. General American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. GrimesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1959
  5. Klem v. Southeast Ceramics, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API