Legal Opinion

Eubanks v. Shewmake Bros.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 21, 1923No. 14083PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJenkins, P. J.

1. The motion containing the general grounds being properly approved and certified, and the record showing an exception to the overruling of such grounds of the motion for a new trial, the exception pendente lite is properly supported by an approved exception to the final judgment, irrespective of the fact that the grounds of the amendment to the motion do not appear to have been approved and certified; and besides, “under the practice act of 1911 (Acts 1911, p. 149, sec. 3), the fact there was no formal approval of the grounds of the amendment to the motion for a new trial (the only entry…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Harvard v. DavisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  2. Clarke v. HavardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. McCall v. HerringSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  4. Taylor v. American Freehold Land Mortgage Co. of London Ltd.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  5. McLean v. CamakSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Booth v. Schmoller & Mueller Piano Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API