Legal Opinion

Township of Sugarloaf v. Bowling

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 19, 2000PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CAPPY, Justice.

We granted this matter in order to determine whether the trial court or the arbitrator has the initial jurisdiction to determine the arbitraribility of a grievance brought by a police officer. We now hold that the issue of whether a particular matter is arbitrable pursuant to Act 1111 is an issue which must be submitted first to the arbitrator, and that it is error to bring the issue of jurisdiction first to the trial court. We therefore affirm the Commonwealth Court’s vacatur of the trial court’s order, albeit on different grounds.

On July 1, 1995, Anthony R. Bowling…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Phillips v. A-Best Products Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Pennsylvania State Police v. Pennsylvania State Troopers' Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Stone & Edwards Insurance Agency, Inc. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Bald Eagle Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  5. Upper Makefield Township v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Town of McCandless v. McCandless Police Officers Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Borough of Montoursville v. Montoursville Police Bargaining UnitCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  3. City of Pittsburgh v. Fraternal Order of Police Fort Pitt Lodge No. 1Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Neshaminy School District v. Neshaminy Federation of TeachersCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Upper Gwynedd Township v. Upper Gwynedd Township Police Ass'nCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2001

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API