Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Consolidated Rail Corp.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 14, 1977No. C 77-7 YPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

LAMBROS, District Judge.

Plaintiffs challenge the decision of the Consolidated Rail Corporation (Conrail) to discontinue rail passenger service between Youngstown and Cleveland, Ohio. This matter came before the Court on January 13,1977 pursuant to plaintiffs’ motion for a temporary restraining order.

In November, 1976, Conrail decided to discontinue rail passenger service between Youngstown and Cleveland as of January 16, 1977. Notice of this discontinuance was issued and distributed by Conrail. The passenger service at issue consists of trains 28 and 29. This…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State of New Jersey v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
  2. Snowden v. Birmingham-Jefferson County Transit AuthorityDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1975
  3. Jones v. ParmerDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1976
  4. Brown v. Consolidated Rail Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People of the State of Illinois v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  2. People of the State of Illinois v. Consolidated Rail CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API