People v. Dago

George Dago appeals from his conviction for aggravated robbery. He contends that the trial court erred (1) in permitting testimony concerning a second, subsequent robbery allegedly involving Dago but for which he was not on trial; and (2) in failing to define the term “simple robbery” when alluding to it as a lesser included offense of aggravated robbery. We find no error and therefore affirm the judgment of the district court.

I

During Dago’s trial on the charge of aggravated robbery committed on November 10, 1969, the complaining witness was allowed to testify that he was again robbed on…