Legal Opinion
CSX Transportation, Inc. v. Haischer
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided April 30, 2003No. 1716, Sept. Term, 2001PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSharer, J.
Following a jury trial in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, a verdict was returned in favor of Francis L. Haischer, appellee, against his employer, CSX Transportation, Inc. (“CSXT”), appellant. In this appeal, CSXT presents the following questions for review:
I. Was the evidence presented insufficient as a matter of law to prove a violation of the Boiler Inspection Act, 49 U.S.C. § 20701?
A. Was there legally sufficient evidence that the locomotive parts and appurtenances were not in proper condition?
B. Was there legally sufficient evidence that the locomotive, its parts and appurtenances,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Eichel v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Lilly v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- North v. NorthCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Southern Railway Co. v. LunsfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Carl R. Stillman v. Norfolk & Western Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- CSX Transportation, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Haischer v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
- Norfolk Southern Railway Corp. v. TillerCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2008
- Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. PrichardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003