Legal Opinion
Lummus Company v. Commonwealth Oil Refining Company, Inc., (Three Cases)
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided August 10, 1960No. 5552-5554Published
1Opinion of the Court
280 F.2d 915
LUMMUS COMPANY, Defendant, Appellant,
v.
COMMONWEALTH OIL REFINING COMPANY, Inc., Plaintiff, Appellee (three cases).
Nos. 5552-5554.
United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.
June 16, 1960.
Rehearing Denied August 10, 1960.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED John T. Cahill, New York City, with whom Lawrence J. McKay, New York City, Raymond L. Falls, Jr., Youngstown, Ohio, Herbert S. McConnell, San Juan, P. R., Putnam, Bell, Santry & Ray, Boston, Mass., Cahill, Gordon, Reindell & Ohl, New York City, and McConnell, Valdes & Kelley, San Juan, P. R., were on brief, for appellant.
John F. Dooling,…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Danann Realty Corp. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.