Legal Opinion

Capeletti Bros. v. Metropolitan Dade County

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided April 13, 1990No. 90-0678-CIVPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMENDED MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

SCOTT, District Judge.

Once again, an action has been brought challenging the constitutionality of a Metropolitan Dade County ordinance and resolution granting preferential treatment to blacks in its contract bidding process. 1 The ordinance has a provision that allows the county to set aside certain designated county contracts exclusively among Black contractors. It also contains a goals provision by which the county can require that a certain percentage of a contract’s value be subcontracted to Black contractors.

Plaintiffs are White construction…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. City of Richmond v. J. A. Croson Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Bethlehem Steel Corp. v. BoileauSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Precision Air Parts, Inc. v. Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Lawrence E. Moch v. East Baton Rouge Parish School BoardCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re DamronUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Georgia · 2019
  2. Group Management Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API