Legal Opinion

Rytkonen v. Butler

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1943No. Docket No. 32, Calendar No. 42,266PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStarr, J.

On December 20, 1915, James Russell, Frank J. Russell, John G. Stenglein, and Edward J. Butler owned in fee, as tenants in common, a certain parcel of land in the city of Ishpeming (herein referred to as parcel one) described as follows:

“Lot 74 and the east 36-23/100 feet of lot 75 in the Cleveland Iron Mining Company’s first addition to the city of Ishpeming, Michigan, together with the buildings and structures thereon, the same being commonly known as the Ishpeming Opera House property. ’ ’

They also held and owned a 50-year lease dated September 23, 1914, covering a certain other parcel of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barrows v. J. N. Fauver Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Town v. Duplex-Power Car Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Voigt v. RemickMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Fuller v. McCormickMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hosner v. BrownMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  2. Herman v. DereszewskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API