Legal Opinion

Voigt v. Remick

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1932No. Docket No. 59, Calendar No. 36,220PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPotter., J.

Plaintiff, claiming to be the owner of 10,000 shares of the capital stock of the Detroit Creamery Company of the value of $450,000, brought suit to enjoin defendants from holding a meeting February 6, 1930, or at any other time, from transacting any business or taking any forward steps in the affairs of the corporation on February 6, 1930, or at any time thereafter, for an order directing the Detroit Creamery Realty Company, in case the court should permit such meeting, to issue to plaintiff, prior to such meeting, 10,000 shares of capital stock of the Detroit Creamery Realty Company, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Forrester v. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. City of St. Louis v. St. Louis Gaslight Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  3. Colgate v. United States Leather Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1907
  4. Byrne v. Schuyler Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  5. Smith v. StoneWyoming Supreme Court · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Madugula v. TaubMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Pergament v. FrazerDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1950
  3. Kraft, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
  4. Michigan Wolverine Student Co-Operative, Inc. v. Wm. Goodyear & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1946
  5. Porter v. C. O. Porter MacHinery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1953

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API