In re Certain Trusts Created by Certain Agreements Dated April 25, 1968 between Marcus & Kaplan
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John B. Riordan, S.
The successor trustee of several lifetime trusts commenced a proceeding for advice and direction regarding the validity of several purported exercises of powers of appointment over the corpus of the trusts. By decision and order dated December 21, 2000, the court rendered its decision regarding the purported exercises of the powers of appointment in four of those trusts (Matter of Marcus, NYLJ, Jan. 3, 2001, at 27, col 1). The court will now consider the exercises of the powers of appointment in the Marcus Group 2 Trust and the RSX Trust and other issues…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Maas v. Cornell UniversityNew York Court of Appeals · 1999
- Cummins v. County of OnondagaNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Maas v. Cornell UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- In re Marine Midland Bank, N. A.New York Court of Appeals · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In re TrustsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Commerce Bank, N.A. v. BolanderCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
- Matter of PinnolaSurrogate's Court, Nassau County · 2026