Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Century Indemnity Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided December 12, 1938PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Per curiam
On an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action at law, in which a jury was waived, the Circuit Court of Appeals refused to consider certain assignments of error upon the ground that they related to findings requested by the defendant after the trial had been concluded. The judgment was affirmed, 90 F. 2d 644, and certiorari was granted. We were unable to accept the conclusion of the Circuit Court of Appeals that when the trial court ordered “that judgment be entered for plaintiff, with interest and costs, upon findings of fact and conclusions of law to be presented,” it was…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. FolsomSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Century Indemnity Co. v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Century Indemnity Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
- McLeod v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1933
- Century Indemnity Co. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sprague v. Ticonic National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Daniel F. KellingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Thornton v. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Statek Corp. v. Development Specialists, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
- Union Pacific Railroad Company, a Corporation v. Laverl Johnson and Joleen Johnson, Husband and Wife, and Pacific Fruit Express Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.