Legal Opinion
Town of Eastchester v. Noble
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 3, 1956PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur D. Brennan, J.
In this action for an injunction, the plaintiff town seeks to enjoin and restrain the defendant from the use to which he has put certain premises located in said town, and which use, it is alleged, constitutes a violation of the zoning’ ordinance adopted by the plaintiff in 1955.
In the main, the facts herein are not in dispute. It appears that in September of 1948, the defendant acquired title to the subject premises which have consisted and still consist of four unimproved lots. The defendant is in the moving and storage business but at no time has he maintained any building or office for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- City of Yonkers v. Rentways, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Village of North Pelham v. OhligerNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Village of North Pelham v. OhligerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
- City of New York v. Pike Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1925
3Cited by4 opinions
- Walls v. GiulianiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- Fabini v. Krammerer Realty Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1958
- Incorporated Village of Westbury v. SamuelsNew York Supreme Court · 1965
- Richard's Service Station, Inc. v. Town of HuntingtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979