Legal Opinion
Village of North Pelham v. Ohliger
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 15, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and judgment directed for plaintiff as prayed for in paragraphs 4 and 6 of the prayer for relief in the complaint, with costs. Aside from the fact that there was no proof to overcome the presumption that the ordinance* was a reasonable exercise of the police power (City of Rochester v. Macauley-Fien M. Co., 199 N. Y. 207; Matter of Stubbe v. Adamson, 220 id. 459), we hold the ordinance is such reasonable exercise as a matter of law. (Matter of Wulfsohn v. Burden, 241 N. Y. 288, decided by Court of Appeals November 24, 1925.) The'finding…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- City of Rochester v. MacAuley-fien Milling Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1910
3Cited by9 opinions
- City of Yonkers v. Rentways, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Reichenbach v. Windward at SouthamptonNew York Supreme Court · 1975
- S. B. Garage Corp. v. MurdockNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Walls v. GiulianiDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1996
- City of Geneva v. Cayuga Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.