Howard v. Tedford

This was an action to recover an amount alleged to be due appellee for wages.

The evidence presented a case proper for submission to a jury, and in the absence of a prejudicial error, their finding should not be disturbed.

There are two errors assigned:

1st. That the trial court erred in excluding answers to two questions put by counsel for appellant to one Howard, a witness.

That this ruling was erroneous can not be urged here, for counsel neglected to make known by proffer or otherwise, what he would prove by the answers sought. The trial court could not pass upon the relevancy or materiality…