Votaw & Hartshorn v. Diehl
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Wright Circuit Court. Action oe Replevin. There was a judgment upon a verdict for plaintiffs.' Defendants appeal. The facts of the case involved in the questions decided appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
I. The plaintiffs allege that they are the abso - lute and unqualified owners of the property in question, a stock of general merchandise, which was seized by defendants upon certain attachments issued against one TI. M. Waite.
The answer shows the attachments upon which the goods were seized — all against Waite, and alleges that plaintiffs’ claim upon a pretended sale of the goods, which was made with the purpose of defrauding Waite’s creditors on the part ‘of plaintiffs and Waite, as well as of one Patterson, who was connected with the transaction.
The questions in the case upon which there…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Jenks v. Knott's Mexican Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1882
3Cited by14 opinions
- Iowa Power and Light Co. v. Abild Construction Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Hutchings v. CobbleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Lemke v. MuellerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1969
- In Re Smith's WillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
- Gaffield v. ScottAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.