Legal Opinion
Keeler v. Fred T. Ley & Co.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided May 23, 1933No. 2766PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILSON, Circuit Judge.
This action is based on deceit. It was first tried before a jury in the District Court of Massachusetts, and a verdict directed for the defendant. On appeal to this court the judgment of the District Court was reversed on the ground that there was evidence of deceit sufficient to go to the jury. 49 F.(2d) 872. It was then sent to an auditor to find the facts, with a stipulation that his findings of facts should be final. On the coming in of the auditor’s report making findings that the false representations were made by the defendant as alleged, the plaintiffs filed a…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Reno v. . BullNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Slater v. Mexican National RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Adams v. . GilligNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Sigafus v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Astor Chauffeured Limousine Co. v. Runnfeldt Investment Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- A. B. v. C. D.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Kalb v. VegaCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Ab v. CdDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1940
- Astor Chauffeured Limousine Company v. Runnfeldt Investment CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.